| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Matrix |
| Date: | 2010-08-11 00:29:26 |
| Message-ID: | 4C61EEE6.20404@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Thom Brown wrote:
> The matrix is also beginning to look a bit busy too. Once support for
> 7.4 and 8.0 stops, do you think we should also drop those columns? If
> so, we could also drop rows where a feature exists from 8.1 or before
> which would trim the list.
>
I think it would be nice to save the existing content to somewhere
before doing that trimming through. Having a chart showing the major
feature evolution of the database that goes back as far as possible is
really useful sometimes. Perhaps forking the current chart into a "7.4
through 9.0" history, and then trimming everything from before 8.1
before adding a 9.1 column?
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-11 04:11:10 | Re: Feature Matrix |
| Previous Message | Rafael Martinez | 2010-08-10 17:46:28 | Re: Updates to regional contacts ... |