Re: Feature Matrix

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature Matrix
Date: 2010-08-11 04:11:10
Message-ID: AANLkTikJYwc2MBC2KZqy9KoAv0Tfe0Mqnfx1Kd9spkWT@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

2010/8/11 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> The matrix is also beginning to look a bit busy too.  Once support for
>> 7.4 and 8.0 stops, do you think we should also drop those columns?  If
>> so, we could also drop rows where a feature exists from 8.1 or before
>> which would trim the list.
>>
>
> I think it would be nice to save the existing content to somewhere before
> doing that trimming through.  Having a chart showing the major feature
> evolution of the database that goes back as far as possible is really useful
> sometimes.  Perhaps forking the current chart into a "7.4 through 9.0"
> history, and then trimming everything from before 8.1 before adding a 9.1
> column?
>

+1

Pavel Stehule

> --
> Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
> greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   www.2ndQuadrant.us
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-08-11 08:15:55 Re: Feature Matrix
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-08-11 00:29:26 Re: Feature Matrix