From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature Matrix |
Date: | 2010-08-11 04:11:10 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikJYwc2MBC2KZqy9KoAv0Tfe0Mqnfx1Kd9spkWT@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
2010/8/11 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>>
>> The matrix is also beginning to look a bit busy too. Once support for
>> 7.4 and 8.0 stops, do you think we should also drop those columns? If
>> so, we could also drop rows where a feature exists from 8.1 or before
>> which would trim the list.
>>
>
> I think it would be nice to save the existing content to somewhere before
> doing that trimming through. Having a chart showing the major feature
> evolution of the database that goes back as far as possible is really useful
> sometimes. Perhaps forking the current chart into a "7.4 through 9.0"
> history, and then trimming everything from before 8.1 before adding a 9.1
> column?
>
+1
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
> greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-08-11 08:15:55 | Re: Feature Matrix |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-08-11 00:29:26 | Re: Feature Matrix |