| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG cleanup and fix for clang compile-time problem |
| Date: | 2024-08-15 07:20:13 |
| Message-ID: | 9dbc7e00-e4ab-4284-9954-12f039f2bdeb@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.08.24 02:43, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Here's a rebased but otherwise identical patchset. I also added
>> an 0007 that removes check_rules.pl as threatened.
>
> I've done some more work on this and hope to post an updated patchset
> tomorrow. Before that though, is there any objection to going ahead
> with pushing the 0001 patch (pgindent'ing ecpg's lexer and parser
> files)? It's pretty bulky yet of no intellectual interest, so I'd
> like to stop carrying it forward.
The indentation patch looks good to me and it would be good to get it
out of the way.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Banck | 2024-08-15 07:20:28 | Re: Improve error message for ICU libraries if pkg-config is absent |
| Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-08-15 07:18:42 | RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication |