Re: One question about security label command

> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> > like to see progress on that front.
>
> Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
> advocate.
>
OK, I'll try to design a new regression test policy that is independent
from the system's policy assumption, like unconfined domain.

Please give me time for this work.

Thanks,
--
NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Frost [mailto:sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 7:16 AM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Kohei KaiGai; Robert Haas; Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); 张元
> 超; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] One question about security label command
>
> Tom,
>
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> > like to see progress on that front.
>
> Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
> advocate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen