From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, 张元超 <zhangyuanchao(at)highgo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: One question about security label command |
Date: | 2015-04-30 22:40:46 |
Message-ID: | 20150430224046.GY4369@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > > The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> > > system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> > > like to see progress on that front.
> >
> > Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
> > advocate.
> >
> OK, I'll try to design a new regression test policy that is independent
> from the system's policy assumption, like unconfined domain.
>
> Please give me time for this work.
Any progress here?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-04-30 22:41:38 | Re: One question about security label command |
Previous Message | Joe Wildish | 2015-04-30 22:36:32 | Implementing SQL ASSERTION |