Re: One question about security label command

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, 张元超 <zhangyuanchao(at)highgo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One question about security label command
Date: 2015-03-16 14:16:25
Message-ID: 20150316141625.GJ29780@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> The idea of making the regression test entirely independent of the
> system's policy would presumably solve this problem, so I'd kind of
> like to see progress on that front.

Apologies, I guess it wasn't clear, but that's what I was intending to
advocate.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-16 15:07:13 pgsql: Support opfamily members in get_object_address
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-03-16 14:09:01 Re: One question about security label command