Re: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: maxime(dot)boyer(at)cra-arc(dot)gc(dot)ca
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106
Date: 2023-10-25 14:21:24
Message-ID: 970627.1698243684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> New firmware were installed on the server, this happened after restarting
> the server. Since then, the database runs on a secondary server without
> issue. That server received the same updates. We haven't tried moving it
> back as this is our production database. Was this a fluke?

> 83 identical errors were logged in the system Event Viewer:
> could not create inherited socket: error code 10106

FWIW, the PG code that throws that error message is old enough
to vote; it's not something we changed in a recent minor release.
So I doubt the PG upgrade was the triggering factor.

I am guessing you saw the impact of some external event,
but I don't know what.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boyer, Maxime (he/him | il/lui) 2023-10-25 14:44:41 RE: BUG #18168: Parallel worker failed to initialize: could not create inherited socket: error code 10106
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-25 13:51:31 Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx