From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Client application name |
Date: | 2009-10-13 18:07:52 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10910131107r4d5ff2c1l888aba2aa2464497@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>>>> - Is my approach reasonable?
>>>
>>> I thought the plan was to have libpq look at an environment variable,
>
>> I wasn't aware we had a plan :-)
>
> There was some previous discussion of this, which I am too lazy to look
> up but I thought we had sketched out an API.
This seems to be the recent one, which is probably what was in the
back of my mind when I decided to spend some spare time on this
project: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01008.php
There's no specific API discussion in either of the referenced threads
though - just some vague hand waving and opining about what it should
do and how it should look (pretty much all of which is covered by my
patch).
Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work
on this :-(
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-10-13 18:26:28 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-13 17:53:56 | Re: Wire protocol docs |