Re: Client application name

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-13 17:38:21
Message-ID: 9910.1255455501@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>>> - Is my approach reasonable?
>>
>> I thought the plan was to have libpq look at an environment variable,

> I wasn't aware we had a plan :-)

There was some previous discussion of this, which I am too lazy to look
up but I thought we had sketched out an API.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-10-13 17:53:12 Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-13 17:24:43 Re: Wire protocol docs