Re: Client application name

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client application name
Date: 2009-10-13 20:13:35
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0910131313x70e7dff2ldd017286f92c6bfe@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work
> on this :-(
>

never mind... i get blocked for the ugliness of the libpq api connect
functions...
and my first attempt to solve that was seriously broken...

besides, as Robert mention, because of pooler connections using a GUC
is more appropiate...

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-10-13 20:18:45 Re: Client application name
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-10-13 19:46:59 Re: Re: [GENERAL] contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints