| From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to fix 0xC0000005 exception in Postgres 9.0 |
| Date: | 2020-02-22 23:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | 93490CD5-B231-4894-AC3A-AFA00D023816@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Feb 22, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2/22/20 5:12 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 2/22/20 2:39 PM, Andrus wrote:
> [snip]
>> This is a different issue and involves a product VFP that is EOL 5-10 years depending on support package. I'm going to say the hand writing is on the wall and it is time to upgrade software.
>
> I don't know where you work, but where I work, old programs where the source code disappeared ages ago, but have worked reliably for 15+ years is distressingly common.
>
> Breaking userland backwards compatibility is a mortal sin, and one of the reasons that MS software is so popular is that they work so hard to not break userland backwards compatibility.
>
> --
Apparently at the expense of forward compatibility;)
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-02-22 23:35:38 | Re: How to fix 0xC0000005 exception in Postgres 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-02-22 23:34:18 | Re: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production server? |