Re: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production server?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication: slave server has 3x size of production server?
Date: 2020-02-22 23:34:18
Message-ID: 22dad45b-7d11-807e-c258-1e9872561f3b@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2/22/20 2:51 PM, Edson Richter wrote:

>
> Yes, it is working. Last X'log file is present on all thee servers.
> Also, comparting last transaction number on master and slave shows that
> all are in sync.
> Last, but not least, select max(id) from a busy table shows same id
> (when queried almost simultaneously using a simple test routine).

Well something is keeping those WAL file around. You probably should
analyze your complete setup to see what else is touching those servers.

>
> >
> >
> > The files are about 7 months old.
>
> Are there newer files that would indicate that the streaming is working?
>
>
> Yes, streaming is working properly (as stated above).
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Edson Richter
>
>
>>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2020-02-22 23:35:16 Re: How to fix 0xC0000005 exception in Postgres 9.0
Previous Message Ron 2020-02-22 23:28:15 Re: How to fix 0xC0000005 exception in Postgres 9.0