From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Michael Paquier'" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
Date: | 2019-02-05 17:02:23 |
Message-ID: | 9198.1549386143@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
>> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
>> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
>> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
>> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
>> ones done.
> The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
> delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.
The only thing keeping me from committing CTE inlining today is doubt
about whether we have consensus on the syntax. Those other two I don't
know the status of.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-02-05 17:04:42 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-02-05 16:59:33 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |