Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Michael Paquier'" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Date: 2019-02-05 17:02:23
Message-ID: 9198.1549386143@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
>> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
>> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
>> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
>> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
>> ones done.

> The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
> delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.

The only thing keeping me from committing CTE inlining today is doubt
about whether we have consensus on the syntax. Those other two I don't
know the status of.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-02-05 17:04:42 Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-02-05 16:59:33 Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed