| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
| Date: | 2019-02-05 17:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20190205170924.o5h6xrobpsn36udv@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019-02-05 12:02:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
> >> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
> >> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
> >> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
> >> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
> >> ones done.
>
> > The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
> > delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.
>
> The only thing keeping me from committing CTE inlining today is doubt
> about whether we have consensus on the syntax. Those other two I don't
> know the status of.
Online checksums has been punted by Magnus, because he didn't have time
to work on it so far. I'd provided him with a prototype of the necessary
infrastructure piece.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-02-05 17:27:52 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-05 17:08:12 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |