From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
Date: | 2019-02-05 16:59:33 |
Message-ID: | 20190205165933.GJ32538@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:55:37AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 06:34:50AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> >> Wow, thank you so much for your hard work. The last CF for PG 12 should be tough...
>
> > Agreed. I am somewhat concerned about this and am wondering what we can
> > do now to limit problems.
>
> There's been talk periodically of having an aggressive triage effort
> to try to sort through the pending patches and decide which ones have
> no hope of making it to commit in the last CF. Then, if we just push
> those off to the next cycle immediately and focus our attention on the
> ones that do have a credible chance, we might get more of the latter
> ones done.
The ones I am really worried about are the ones that keep getting
delayed, e.g., CTE inlining, online checksums, multi-variate statistics.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-05 17:02:23 | Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-02-05 16:57:05 | Re: fast defaults in heap_getattr vs heap_deform_tuple |