Re: backend died

From: "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backend died
Date: 2004-11-15 21:02:32
Message-ID: 9150DCE0CCB4D411A7DB00508BB0DBF20B59D00E@msx1am.matrixone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:34 PM
> To: Brusser, Michael
> Cc: Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] backend died
>
>
> "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com> writes:
> > 2004-11-13 10:01:06 [10456] DEBUG: child process (pid 19285) was
> > terminated by signal 10
>
> > The log-statements option was already enabled,
> > here's what I see prior to the crash:
>
> That's no help. What were the last few lines from process 19285?

That's the strangest thing: the log file begins with
2004-11-12 11:49:14 [10456] DEBUG: FindExec: found
"/lsi/soft/synchronicity/latest/syncinc/bin.sol2/postgres" using argv[0]

- it continues with all SQL statements until it crashes; but the only
reference to pid 19285 is:

2004-11-13 10:01:06 [10456] DEBUG: child process (pid 19285) was
terminated by signal 10
2004-11-13 10:01:06 [10456] LOG: server process (pid 19285) was terminated
by signal 10

there are no prior occurrences of token 19285 in the file.

> ... you're running an obsolete version of PG ;-).
> At least get it updated to 7.3.8.

I'd love to, but this is not something I can do. Have to live with that,
as well as with the fact that many of our customers are running on NFS
(yes, I know...)

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-15 21:12:18 Re: backend died
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-15 20:33:36 Re: backend died