Re: backend died

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backend died
Date: 2004-11-15 21:12:18
Message-ID: 10782.1100553138@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com> writes:
>> That's no help. What were the last few lines from process 19285?

> there are no prior occurrences of token 19285 in the file.

Hmm, so it seems 19285 died during startup. That does make a hardware
problem seem a bit plausible --- the backend start sequence is pretty
well tested ;-).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-11-16 00:54:53 Re: postmaster segfaults with HUGE table
Previous Message Brusser, Michael 2004-11-15 21:02:32 Re: backend died