Re: backend died

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backend died
Date: 2004-11-15 20:33:36
Message-ID: 10432.1100550816@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Brusser, Michael" <Michael(dot)Brusser(at)matrixone(dot)com> writes:
> 2004-11-13 10:01:06 [10456] DEBUG: child process (pid 19285) was
> terminated by signal 10

> The log-statements option was already enabled,
> here's what I see prior to the crash:

That's no help. What were the last few lines from process 19285?

> This is a brand new machine. Is it likely that a bad memory chip may cause
> this?

Possibly, but it would not do to point fingers at the hardware when
you're running an obsolete version of PG ;-). At least get it updated
to 7.3.8.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brusser, Michael 2004-11-15 21:02:32 Re: backend died
Previous Message Brusser, Michael 2004-11-15 20:01:44 Re: backend died