Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Date: 2019-10-02 17:15:37
Message-ID: 87tv8r134v.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

Tom> * Please run it through pgindent. Otherwise v13+ are going to be
Tom> randomly different from older branches in this area, once we next
Tom> pgindent HEAD.

gotcha.

Tom> * I think you missed s/walk/mutate/ in some of the comments you
Tom> copied into query_tree_mutator.

... where? The only mention of "walk" near query_tree_mutator is in its
header comment, which I didn't touch.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-02 17:21:51 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-10-02 16:56:29 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-10-02 17:21:51 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-10-02 16:56:29 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition