Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition
Date: 2019-10-02 17:21:51
Message-ID: 11595.1570036911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom> * I think you missed s/walk/mutate/ in some of the comments you
> Tom> copied into query_tree_mutator.

> ... where? The only mention of "walk" near query_tree_mutator is in its
> header comment, which I didn't touch.

Wup, sorry, I misparsed the patch. On second read there's no issue there.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shital A 2019-10-02 18:28:06 Urgent :: Postgresql streaming replication issue - sync mode
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-10-02 17:15:37 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-10-02 17:23:37 format of pg_upgrade loadable_libraries warning
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-10-02 17:15:37 Re: Possible bug: SQL function parameter in window frame definition