| From: | Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres |
| Date: | 2006-05-18 05:25:09 |
| Message-ID: | 87iro3ucp6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
* Joshua D. Drake:
>>> Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses?
>> GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible.
>
> LGPL?
>
> My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source
> application if it is GPL.
Closed source? It's a PHP framework. 8-)
Anyway, for a web application, the GPL is usually *less* restrictive
than various BSD license variants because you do not need to mention
the software in the end user documentation. The viral aspect of the
GPL does not come into play because you do not actually distribute the
software. You just run it on your servers.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-05-18 05:28:03 | Re: PG_DIAG_STATEMENT_POSITION Where is it defined? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2006-05-18 05:04:53 | Re: Why won't it index scan? |