From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres |
Date: | 2006-05-16 21:12:04 |
Message-ID: | 446A4024.2030706@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses?
>
> GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible.
LGPL?
My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source
application if it is GPL.
That may be your intent (which I actually don't have a business problem
with), I was just curious as to your decision.
> As is customary, GPL downloaders get no support, but folks who want a
> closer relationship with us can pursue any avenue that is reasonable for
> both of us. We can do complete development, as we do for our current
> customers who know little and care less about the tools we use, or
> training, consulting and so forth.
Sure.
> For corporate customers, it does not matter much whether you call it a
> license or something else, some expenditures are made to support the
> customer's effort and the customer is asked to provide the funds for
> that. Call it consulting fees, call it licensing, call it training or
> support, it is all the same thing.
O.k. so you are going to charge a corporate customer to allow them to
get their code their own?
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tony Wasson | 2006-05-16 21:13:47 | Re: FATAL: could not read statistics message |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-16 20:56:17 | Re: FATAL: could not read statistics message |