Re: Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Announce: GPL Framework centered on Postgres
Date: 2006-05-22 21:06:12
Message-ID: 20060522210612.GT64371@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:25:09AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake:
>
> >>> Sounds great! But why GPL? Are you looking to sell licenses?
> >> GPL is to spread it as far and wide as possible as fast as possible.
> >
> > LGPL?
> >
> > My concern would be, I can't use this toolkit for a closed source
> > application if it is GPL.
>
> Closed source? It's a PHP framework. 8-)
>
> Anyway, for a web application, the GPL is usually *less* restrictive
> than various BSD license variants because you do not need to mention
> the software in the end user documentation. The viral aspect of the

The BSD license requires no such thing. It only requires that you
maintain the notice in the code. I challenge you to find a less
restrictive license. :)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2006-05-22 21:07:41 Re: CRM/Sales Management Software For PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tony Caduto 2006-05-22 20:54:16 Re: Interface