Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups

From: Chris Ruprecht <chris(at)ruprecht(dot)org>
To: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>, Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups
Date: 2008-05-13 02:56:20
Message-ID: 87F7C977-3160-42BC-98CF-5271B972C0D9@ruprecht.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Joshua,

did you try to run the 345 on an IBM ServeRAID 6i?
I have one in mine, but I never actually ran any speed test.
Do you have any benchmarks that I could run and compare?

best regards,
chris
--
chris ruprecht
database grunt and bit pusher extraordinaíre

On May 12, 2008, at 22:11, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> On Mon, 12 May 2008 22:04:03 -0400
> Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Inheritted a number of servers and I am starting to look into the
>>

[snip]

> Comparing software raid on an LSI onboard for an IBM 345 versus a
> 2120s
> using hardware raid 10, the software raid completely blew the adaptec
> away.

[more snip]

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Reyes 2008-05-13 03:24:09 Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-05-13 02:11:18 Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups