Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups

From: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
To: Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups
Date: 2008-05-13 03:24:09
Message-ID: cone.1210649049.496992.84940.1000@zoraida.natserv.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Joshua D. Drake writes:

> Most likely you have a scsi onboard as well I am guessing.

Will check.

> shouldn't bother with the 2120. My tests show it is a horrible
> controller for random writes.

Thanks for the feedback..

> Comparing software raid on an LSI onboard for an IBM 345 versus a 2120s
> using hardware raid 10, the software raid completely blew the adaptec
> away.

Any PCI controller you have had good experience with?
How any other PCI-X/PCI-e controller that you have had good results?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolas Everett 2008-05-13 03:46:54 Re: Partitioning: INSERT 0 0 but want INSERT 0 1
Previous Message Chris Ruprecht 2008-05-13 02:56:20 Re: RAID controllers for Postgresql on large setups