Re: fsync vs open_sync

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fsync vs open_sync
Date: 2004-08-10 03:05:31
Message-ID: 877js7itfo.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:

>> Just out of interest, what happens to the difference if you use *ext3*
>> (perhaps with data=writeback)
>
> Actually, I was working for a client, so it wasn't a general exploritory,
> but I can say that early on we discovered that ext3 was about the worst
> file system for PostgreSQL. We gave up on it and decided to use ext2.

I'd be interested in which ext3 mount options you used--I can see how
anything other than 'data=writeback' could be a performance killer.
I've been meaning to run a few tests myself, but haven't had the
time...

-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-08-10 03:09:30 Re: VACUUM DELAY
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-10 02:35:49 Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes)