From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fsync vs open_sync |
Date: | 2004-08-10 03:05:31 |
Message-ID: | 877js7itfo.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
>> Just out of interest, what happens to the difference if you use *ext3*
>> (perhaps with data=writeback)
>
> Actually, I was working for a client, so it wasn't a general exploritory,
> but I can say that early on we discovered that ext3 was about the worst
> file system for PostgreSQL. We gave up on it and decided to use ext2.
I'd be interested in which ext3 mount options you used--I can see how
anything other than 'data=writeback' could be a performance killer.
I've been meaning to run a few tests myself, but haven't had the
time...
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-08-10 03:09:30 | Re: VACUUM DELAY |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-10 02:35:49 | Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes) |