| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM DELAY |
| Date: | 2004-08-10 03:09:30 |
| Message-ID: | 41183C6A.9060307@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/9/2004 7:41 PM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> If I remember well this is the first command that need to change
> GUC in order to change behaviour, I don't think we wrote:
>
> set vacuum_mode = full;
> set vacuum_verbosity = on;
> vacuum;
You got a point here. However, we don't have
SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = 'bumm' NOSEQSCAN;
either, and I hope you don't suggest doing that next :-)
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-10 03:19:25 | Re: PITR - Some data is not recovered. |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2004-08-10 03:05:31 | Re: fsync vs open_sync |