From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM DELAY |
Date: | 2004-08-10 03:09:30 |
Message-ID: | 41183C6A.9060307@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/9/2004 7:41 PM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> If I remember well this is the first command that need to change
> GUC in order to change behaviour, I don't think we wrote:
>
> set vacuum_mode = full;
> set vacuum_verbosity = on;
> vacuum;
You got a point here. However, we don't have
SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = 'bumm' NOSEQSCAN;
either, and I hope you don't suggest doing that next :-)
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-10 03:19:25 | Re: PITR - Some data is not recovered. |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2004-08-10 03:05:31 | Re: fsync vs open_sync |