Re: fsync vs open_sync

From: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
To: "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fsync vs open_sync
Date: 2004-08-10 03:05:31
Message-ID: 17872.24.91.171.78.1092107131.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Just out of interest, what happens to the difference if you use *ext3*
> (perhaps with data=writeback)

Actually, I was working for a client, so it wasn't a general exploritory,
but I can say that early on we discovered that ext3 was about the worst
file system for PostgreSQL. We gave up on it and decided to use ext2.

I have been considering a full sweep in my test lab off client time later on.

ext2, ext3, jfs, xfs, and ReiserFS, fsync on with fdatasync or open_sync,
and fsync off.

One million inserts with auto commit.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-08-10 03:09:30 Re: VACUUM DELAY
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-10 02:35:49 Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes)