| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM DELAY |
| Date: | 2004-08-10 16:42:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4118FAFC.6000600@bigfoot.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 8/9/2004 7:41 PM, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>> If I remember well this is the first command that need to change
>> GUC in order to change behaviour, I don't think we wrote:
>>
>> set vacuum_mode = full;
>> set vacuum_verbosity = on;
>> vacuum;
>
>
> You got a point here. However, we don't have
>
> SELECT foo FROM bar WHERE baz = 'bumm' NOSEQSCAN;
>
> either, and I hope you don't suggest doing that next :-)
Good idea indeed :-)
This could be the first step to give some hints to the planner,
Informix have it for sure and if I remember well Oracle have it,
Sybase have it...
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-10 17:01:42 | Re: Add Missing From? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-10 16:42:20 | Re: fsync vs open_sync (more info) |