Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date: 2007-10-23 16:14:26
Message-ID: 873aw1q04d.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> hword_asciipart
> hword_part
> hword_numpart

Out of curiosity would the foo in foo-bär or the foo-beta1 be a
hword_asciipart or a hword_part/hword_numpart?

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2007-10-23 16:17:31 Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Previous Message Harald Armin Massa 2007-10-23 16:13:44 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit