Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date: 2007-10-23 16:19:11
Message-ID: 19502.1193156351@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Out of curiosity would the foo in foo-br or the foo-beta1 be a
> hword_asciipart or a hword_part/hword_numpart?

foo would be hword_asciipart independently of what was in the other
parts of the hword. AFAICS this is what you want for the purpose,
which is to know which dictionary stack to push the token through.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-10-23 16:22:11 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2007-10-23 16:17:31 Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence