Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing
Date: 2007-10-23 15:44:39
Message-ID: 18876.1193154279@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> If we were doing it from scratch I would suggest using longer names. At the
>> least I would still suggest using "ascii" or "asciiword" instead of "aword".

> +1 for asciiword; "aword" sounds too much like "a word" which is not the
> meaning I think we're trying to convey.

OK, so with that and Michael's suggestion we have

asciiword
word
numword

asciihword
hword
numhword

hword_asciipart
hword_part
hword_numpart

Sold?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-23 15:49:35 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-23 15:42:56 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4