Re: 9.0 release notes done

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Date: 2010-03-20 18:27:40
Message-ID: 8645.1269109660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
> flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
> 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.

Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is that it's supposed to
be more stable than an alpha. If we pull back on our stability
commitments (like "no further initdbs expected") we'll just discourage
people from trying betas in future.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-20 18:30:28 Re: 9.0 release notes done
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-03-20 17:45:45 Re: 9.0 release notes done