From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Date: | 2010-03-20 18:33:14 |
Message-ID: | 162867791003201133m3ef899afva0643ba1b718b44b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/3/20 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
>> flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
>> 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
>
> Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is that it's supposed to
> be more stable than an alpha. If we pull back on our stability
> commitments (like "no further initdbs expected") we'll just discourage
> people from trying betas in future.
I agree with Tom - two weeks are nothing against to an lost of credit and trust.
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-03-20 19:54:36 | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-03-20 18:32:14 | Re: 9.0 release notes done |