Re: 9.0 release notes done

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Date: 2010-03-20 18:33:14
Message-ID: 162867791003201133m3ef899afva0643ba1b718b44b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/3/20 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
>> flux.  This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
>> 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
>
> Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is that it's supposed to
> be more stable than an alpha.  If we pull back on our stability
> commitments (like "no further initdbs expected") we'll just discourage
> people from trying betas in future.

I agree with Tom - two weeks are nothing against to an lost of credit and trust.

Pavel
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2010-03-20 19:54:36 Re: 9.0 release notes done
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-20 18:32:14 Re: 9.0 release notes done