| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
| Date: | 2010-03-20 18:32:14 |
| Message-ID: | 201003201832.o2KIWEN13132@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > I'd favor a beta sooner rather than later even if some stuff is still in
> > flux. This particular release needs as much testing as possible, and
> > 10x as many people will try a beta as an alpha.
>
> Well, the reason they are willing to try a beta is that it's supposed to
> be more stable than an alpha. If we pull back on our stability
> commitments (like "no further initdbs expected") we'll just discourage
> people from trying betas in future.
Agreed. If you want beta earlier, we are going to need to close the
HS/SR issues sooner.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-03-20 18:33:14 | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-03-20 18:30:28 | Re: 9.0 release notes done |