Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification

From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Date: 2023-06-02 11:11:23
Message-ID: 84ced441-e4d8-c5b9-ea15-561e0c2b5d92@pro-open.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Am 02.06.23 um 00:31 schrieb Adrian Klaver:

> 2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the
> information out to test takers?
I guess it'd make sense to ask the LPI folks how they handle this.

Maybe we could even slip under their umbrella, once the community agrees
on a (closed) group working on the actual exam questions...?

Just my 2p,
--
Gunnar "Nick" Bluth

Eimermacherweg 106
D-48159 Münster

Mobil +49 172 8853339
Email: gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de
__________________________________________________________________________
"Ceterum censeo SystemD esse delendam" - Cato

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Katherine Mcmillan 2023-06-02 13:13:35 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2023-06-02 11:04:41 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification