Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Date: 2023-06-01 22:31:32
Message-ID: a2a248ef-0a02-2e9f-c8ed-6d7363ad8619@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 6/1/23 15:04, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> At PgCon I mentioned a was going to create this thread so here we go:
>

>
> So, having a certification made from a pool of validated
> questions/answers don't only will help companies choosing trainings
> but will in effect improve the quality of trainers.
>
> There are a lot of open questions yet, like where the exams will be
> taken. In the community infrastructure? in the company's?
>
> but I guess we have still enough for start commenting.
1) Who oversees all of the above?

2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the
information out to test takers?

3) Does core mean just the community Postgres?

>
> --
> Jaime Casanova
> Director de Servicios Profesionales
> SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Valeria Kaplan 2023-06-02 09:57:18 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2023-06-01 22:04:43 RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification