Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
To: Valeria Kaplan <kaplan(dot)valeria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Date: 2023-06-02 11:04:41
Message-ID: CADK3HH+ROOZrsUBoCcPv2f-gHSFtjWfWRaeWdcAYtv=ZrRLC1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 05:57, Valeria Kaplan <kaplan(dot)valeria(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thank you for bringing this topic to discussion, Jaime!
>
> To add to Adrian's questions here are my 5 cents
>
> Postgres is a community that consists of people from different companies
> with variety of interests:
> - Postgres/open source/community-focused interests
> - personal interests
> - their company's interests
>
> To create a fully "unbiased" certification there is a need for a working
> group whose interests would be fully aligned.
>
Agreed

> I must admit, I'm a bit pessimistic about a unified Postgres certification
> as it would put people who would be working on it in a difficult situation
> when they're serving all the abovementioned interests.
>

My pessimism is more around how you keep the answers from becoming public
knowledge. I don't think that should stop us from working on this however.

Dave

>
>
> Valeria
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 11:31 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/23 15:04, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > At PgCon I mentioned a was going to create this thread so here we go:
>> >
>>
>> >
>> > So, having a certification made from a pool of validated
>> > questions/answers don't only will help companies choosing trainings
>> > but will in effect improve the quality of trainers.
>> >
>> > There are a lot of open questions yet, like where the exams will be
>> > taken. In the community infrastructure? in the company's?
>> >
>> > but I guess we have still enough for start commenting.
>> 1) Who oversees all of the above?
>>
>> 2) How are the questions and answers developed without leaking the
>> information out to test takers?
>>
>> 3) Does core mean just the community Postgres?
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jaime Casanova
>> > Director de Servicios Profesionales
>> > SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Klaver
>> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>>
>>
>>
>>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gunnar "Nick" Bluth 2023-06-02 11:11:23 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification
Previous Message Valeria Kaplan 2023-06-02 09:57:18 Re: RFC: a new try for an official community approved certification