Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-04-05 07:33:25
Message-ID: 82c4c816-06f6-d3e3-ba02-fca4a5cef065@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.03.23 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 09.03.23 20:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
>>> Let's come back to that after dealing with the other two.
>>
>> Leaving 0001 open for now.
>
> I suspect making a change like this now would result in a bloodbath on
> the build farm that we could do without.  I suggest revisiting this
> after the commit fest ends.

I don't object to this patch. I suggest waiting until next week to
commit it and then see what happens. It's easy to revert if it goes
terribly.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2023-04-05 07:42:19 Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-04-05 07:32:19 RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure