| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? |
| Date: | 2023-04-17 13:23:03 |
| Message-ID: | ZD1INw6en0EUInYH@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:33:25AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16.03.23 14:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 09.03.23 20:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > > > Let's come back to that after dealing with the other two.
> > >
> > > Leaving 0001 open for now.
> >
> > I suspect making a change like this now would result in a bloodbath on
> > the build farm that we could do without. I suggest revisiting this
> > after the commit fest ends.
>
> I don't object to this patch. I suggest waiting until next week to commit
> it and then see what happens. It's easy to revert if it goes terribly.
Is this still being considered for v16 ?
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-04-17 13:25:54 | Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop) |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2023-04-17 12:57:07 | Re: longfin missing gssapi_ext.h |