Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-03-16 13:52:51
Message-ID: d22a37cf-472d-cf05-4398-d370879ae6cb@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.03.23 20:14, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Let's come back to that after dealing with the other two.
>
> Leaving 0001 open for now.

I suspect making a change like this now would result in a bloodbath on
the build farm that we could do without. I suggest revisiting this
after the commit fest ends.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-03-16 14:21:23 Re: gcc 13 warnings
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2023-03-16 13:40:04 gcc 13 warnings