Re: pl/pgsql list

My thought is on it's own pl/pgsql is just as important as straight SQL.
Maybe as time goes on we will see higher volumes of pl/pgsql questions, if
that is what warrants a separate list. I personally don't see why one would
put pl/pgsql in with everything else. Maybe because I come from an Oracle
world where volumes of books have been written on PL/SQL on it's own.
Bob

On 6/7/05, Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
> > What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems
> > pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make sense,
> > and if it did can we have a separate list?
>
> I don't think it makes sense--it's not like traffic related to
> pl/pgsql floods out everything else on the list. For better or worse,
> it's an integral part of PG--what's the rationale for a separate list?
>
> -Doug
>