Re: pl/pgsql list

Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> My thought is on it's own pl/pgsql is just as important as straight SQL.
> Maybe as time goes on we will see higher volumes of pl/pgsql questions, if
> that is what warrants a separate list. I personally don't see why one
> would put pl/pgsql in with everything else. Maybe because I come from an
> Oracle world where volumes of books have been written on PL/SQL on it's
> own.

When the list traffic demands it, perhaps it'll be considered. Until
then there's no reason to multiply lists beyond necessity. Even Tom
Lane has an upper limit on the number of lists he can read each day. :)

-Doug