Re: pl/pgsql list

From: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql list
Date: 2005-06-07 21:05:02
Message-ID: m2hdg93mkh.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bob <luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems
> pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make sense,
> and if it did can we have a separate list?

I don't think it makes sense--it's not like traffic related to
pl/pgsql floods out everything else on the list. For better or worse,
it's an integral part of PG--what's the rationale for a separate list?

-Doug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohan, Ross 2005-06-07 22:06:26 Re: Things I learned about PG8 on AIX5.3 with XLC compiler
Previous Message Ed L. 2005-06-07 20:57:05 Re: db corruption/recovery help