Re: pg_basebackup -k option

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup -k option
Date: 2018-05-21 14:27:31
Message-ID: 759691a2-8568-bc0f-f48b-fc1f12d5e991@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/18/18 11:26, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> How about using capital -K in pg_basebackup? Or maybe it doesn't need a
>>> short option at all.
>>
>> +1 for no short option.
>
> Makes sense to me, I wasn't happy about the -k back then (and I think I
> solicited feedback on that).
>
> PFA a patch which should remove the short option.

committed (needed test and documentation adjustments, too)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-05-21 14:58:50 Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-05-21 14:22:19 Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions