| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup -k option |
| Date: | 2018-05-21 14:27:31 |
| Message-ID: | 759691a2-8568-bc0f-f48b-fc1f12d5e991@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/18/18 11:26, Michael Banck wrote:
>>> How about using capital -K in pg_basebackup? Or maybe it doesn't need a
>>> short option at all.
>>
>> +1 for no short option.
>
> Makes sense to me, I wasn't happy about the -k back then (and I think I
> solicited feedback on that).
>
> PFA a patch which should remove the short option.
committed (needed test and documentation adjustments, too)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-05-21 14:58:50 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-21 14:22:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions |