| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions |
| Date: | 2018-05-21 14:22:19 |
| Message-ID: | 27924.1526912539@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/13/17 19:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> SMODIFY = SHARABLE ffunc does some one-time change like sorting,
> so state merging is OK but not window agg
> Is "sharable" the preferred spelling, as opposed to "shareable"?
Hmm ... I looked in two different dictionaries, and they both say
sharable is a variant of shareable. So while it's not wrong exactly,
I seem to have picked the less preferred spelling.
I could run around and change it, but I'd have to do so *right now*
I think --- once we release beta1 the costs of changing this would
go up.
Will do so if there's not objections in an hour or so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-05-21 14:27:31 | Re: pg_basebackup -k option |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-05-21 14:14:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Aggregate transition state merging vs. hypothetical set functions |