From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak |
Date: | 2005-10-21 20:34:09 |
Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD679@Herge.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> Hm, what were the tests exactly? Offhand I'd expect something like a
> SELECT COUNT(*) on a large but not-too-wide table to show noticeable
> improvement.
>
> regards, tom lane
I STAND CORRECTED! My tests were high volume record by record
iterators, etc. Read and drool, gentlemen.
Merlin
=============stock============
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 844.000 ms
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 843.000 ms
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 844.000 ms
esp=# \q
=============patched============
esp=# \timing
Timing is on.
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 453.000 ms
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 468.000 ms
esp=# select count(*) from data1.line_file;
count
--------
321306
(1 row)
Time: 469.000 ms
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-10-21 20:36:35 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-21 20:14:58 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak |