Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

From: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date: 2005-10-21 20:39:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0510211638590.23373@josh.db
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> > "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> > Hm, what were the tests exactly? Offhand I'd expect something like a
> > SELECT COUNT(*) on a large but not-too-wide table to show noticeable
> > improvement.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> I STAND CORRECTED! My tests were high volume record by record
> iterators, etc. Read and drool, gentlemen.
>

Great! Did you patch the "volatile" thing?

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2005-10-21 20:41:39 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-21 20:38:49 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak