Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak
Date: 2005-10-21 20:36:35
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E767@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Hm, what were the tests exactly? Offhand I'd expect
> something like a
> > SELECT COUNT(*) on a large but not-too-wide table to show
> noticeable
> > improvement.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> I STAND CORRECTED! My tests were high volume record by
> record iterators, etc. Read and drool, gentlemen.

Wow, that's just great!

Was that with the volatile attribute or not?

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-21 20:38:49 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2005-10-21 20:34:09 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance tweak