| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | californiasailor(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A simple question |
| Date: | 2018-02-01 13:03:09 |
| Message-ID: | 6B9C9BBA-145E-47AF-9330-50C1F553405F@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 01 Feb 2018, at 13:09, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html
> Description:
>
> Hello, my client has a plethora of reserved words in their PostgreSQL
> database using Greenplum. They don't wish to use the " " to allow for them
> to remain....my question is, do you have a parameter I can set to bypass
> PostgreSQL from flagging the reserved word all together?
If your question concerns Greenplum and not PostgreSQL, the gpdb mailing lists
are probably a better fit:
https://greenplum.org/mailing-lists/
cheers ./daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Wolski | 2018-02-02 01:23:31 | Re: removal of md5 from example code |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2018-02-01 12:09:53 | A simple question |